[175478] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Wed Oct 22 16:34:30 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:34:18 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: David Ford <david@blue-labs.org>
In-Reply-To: <54480717.2030609@blue-labs.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> the vast majority of negative tongue wagging regarding systemd is ill
> informed.
can we skip the ad homina and leave that for the systemd dev fora?
> does systemd have growing pains? definitely. are some egos involved?
> sure. can systemd be far reaching? yes, is such reach mandated?
> no. use the units you want and disregard the rest.
how does this work out in practice? at install, can i choose whether
systemd is used for X as opposed for the separate component? can i
template such choices for cluster deployment with the usual tools?
as barry said, we get to drive this car.
randy
