[175449] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Linux: concerns over systemd adoption and Debian's
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miles Fidelman)
Wed Oct 22 12:12:26 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:12:07 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
CC: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD-DQxRs6dzkBmb8NRWM2D+4CACKENsC18jP3_bQjpP87brWfg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Israel G. Lugo <israel.lugo@lugosys.com> wrote:
>> Not intending to start a flame war here.
> Bull. If you've been around the FOSS community even for a short
> while, you'd know that systemd has become a religious topic akin to
> Emacs vs. Vi "discussions" etc. I realize that many of the people
> that read the NANOG list also use Linux systems, but that's not what I
> come here for.
>
> Please, take the systemd discussions to the mailing lists for your
> distribution of choice.
>
Seems to me, this has been a very rational discussion, confined to one
very identifiable thread, containing what at least this reader finds
very useful (operational impacts of systemd in server-side environments,
and what alternatives people are looking at).
If you're not interested, you have a delete key. Please use it, and
don't turn this into a flame war.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
