[175440] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nanog@jack.fr.eu.org)
Wed Oct 22 07:24:49 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:23:02 +0200
From: nanog@jack.fr.eu.org
CC: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACQ0XpJWRebO2=OfpF15s4agSNGNCpykGdbtXmzYy4swbpfyDw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
When it's working, no doupt, I'll be fine
I don't care (or just a few) about when it's working.
The point is: what about it's failure ?
On the ethical point of view, systemd is killed anyway
On 22/10/2014 13:00, Daniel Ankers wrote:
> On 22 October 2014 11:34, <nanog@jack.fr.eu.org
> <mailto:nanog@jack.fr.eu.org>> wrote:
>
> Before leaving Debian, things to think:
> - will systemd be officialy the only system available ?
> - if so, won't we get a way to bypass that ?
>
>
> And one other thought... is it really that bad?
>
> Personally I like it a lot better than sysV plus inittab plus daemontools.
>
> Dan
