[175412] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ricky Beam)
Tue Oct 21 19:58:37 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Jay Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:56:27 -0400
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9889181.6613.1413930584963.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:29:44 -0400, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
> The thing that I don't understand about systemd is how it managed to get
> *EVERY SINGLE DISTRIBUTION'S RELEASE MANAGER* on board...
It's spelled "Red Hat". Add in GNOME and debian (et. al.) is backed into a
corner. Red Hat is soo f'ing big, pretty much every project under the sun
is going to stop maintaining scripts in favor of systemd.
