[175336] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: large BCP38 compliance testing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Octavio Alvarez)
Mon Oct 20 15:23:33 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:22:34 -0700
From: Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org>
To: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>, Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CAAAwwbWG6+NtR9MSgxK-RDpDB=UVyDoEVQDacNifob+wZavTxA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 05/10/14 18:44, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>> The *real* problem isn't the testing.
>> It's the assumption that you can actually *do* anything useful with this data.
>> Name-n-shame probably won't get us far - and the way the US works, if there's a
>
> At least "name and shame" is something more useful than nothing done.
Has it worked for the deaggregation offenders named by the CIDR report?
