[175127] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Dobbins)
Thu Oct 9 13:04:50 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <F6AD5E19-0975-45DF-B11B-0D14A3BA23F8@delong.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:04:36 +0700
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Oct 9, 2014, at 11:31 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> Nanites, window blinds, and soda cans, I can believe. Molecules, I =
tend to doubt.
Various controlled compounds have been chemically tagged for years. NFC =
or something similar is the logical next step (it also holds a lot of =
promise and implications for supply-chains in general, physical security =
applications, transportation, etc.).
> I think we will see larger network segments, but I think we will also =
see greater separation of networks into segments along various =
administrative and/or automatic aggregation boundaries. The virtual =
topologies you describe will likely also have related prefix =
consequences.
Concur, but my guess is that they will be essentially superimposed, =
without any increase in hierarchy - in fact, quite the opposite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Equo ne credite, Teucri.
-- Laoco=F6n
