[175115] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Dobbins)
Thu Oct 9 10:47:31 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <527DE923-54F7-4F13-843E-1B21AB75E2D8@delong.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 21:39:40 +0700
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Oct 9, 2014, at 2:15 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> Also, claiming that 90% will never have more than 2 or 3 subnets =
simply displays a complete lack of imagination.
On the contrary, I believe that the increase in the potential address =
pool size will lead to much flatter, less hierarchical networks - while =
at the same time leading to most nodes being highly multi-homed into =
various virtual topologies, thereby leading to significant increases of =
addresses per node.
A 'node' being things like molecules, nanites, window blinds, soda cans, =
etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Equo ne credite, Teucri.
-- Laoco=F6n
