[175101] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Auer)
Thu Oct 9 05:04:27 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:04:11 +1100
In-Reply-To: <CACQ0XpKpByVAQKxD=G7MVYKP5fBdN+7rZw9OcPibzgShrXz2PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 09:46 +0100, Daniel Ankers wrote:
> What I realised was that (sticking to best practices)
You mean "subnet only on 4-bit boundaries"?
Nibble boundaries are nice for human readability, but if there is a good
technical reason for other boundaries, you shouldn't shy away from them.
Regards, K.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://twitter.com/kauer389
GPG fingerprint: EC67 61E2 C2F6 EB55 884B E129 072B 0AF0 72AA 9882
Old fingerprint: B862 FB15 FE96 4961 BC62 1A40 6239 1208 9865 5F9A
