[175009] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roy)
Wed Oct 8 08:44:24 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 05:42:15 -0700
From: Roy <r.engehausen@gmail.com>
To: Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon@cox.net>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5434CD19.8050704@cox.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/7/2014 10:35 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 10/7/2014 23:44, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:10:15 -0500, Larry Sheldon said:
>>> The cell service is not a requirement placed upon them, I am pretty
>>> sure.
>>
>> However, once having chosen to provide it, and thus create an
>> expectation
>> that cellular E911 is available, they're obligated to carry through on
>> that.
>>
> Obligated by what law, regulation, rule or contract?
>
Obligated by the FCC license
