[175006] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Wed Oct 8 01:43:07 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:42:57 -0500
From: Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <0Vc61p00p1cZc5601Vc8Me>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On 10/8/2014 00:35, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 10/7/2014 23:44, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:10:15 -0500, Larry Sheldon said:
>>> The cell service is not a requirement placed upon them, I am pretty
>>> sure.
>>
>> However, once having chosen to provide it, and thus create an expectation
>> that cellular E911 is available, they're obligated to carry through on
>> that.
>>
> Obligated by what law, regulation, rule or contract?
>

I lived in the area and worked in San Francisco when BART was built, and 
while I never rode BART regularly, I have no recall of cell service on 
BART or MUNI being a safety issue or advertised as such.

-- 
The unique Characteristics of System Administrators:

The fact that they are infallible; and,

The fact that they learn from their mistakes.


Quis custodiet ipsos custodes

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post