[174984] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Weird Issues within L3
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Khurram Khan)
Tue Oct 7 17:13:57 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <F9C3C740698EE241AA8175868A79DE5A0CD5BCC2@SI0244.clients.scripps.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:13:49 -0600
From: Khurram Khan <kkhan@brokenflea.net>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
what's interesting is that out of my XO peering, I show no packet loss
but out of L3, I do see packet loss.
XO out of Denver:
Sending 100, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.2.2.4, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 69.171.180.67
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (100/100), round-trip min/avg/max =3D 12/15/16 =
ms
L3 out of San Diego:
Packet sent with a source address of 63.214.184.3
!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Success rate is 98 percent (98/100), round-trip min/avg/max =3D 1/7/16 ms
L3 out of Phoenix:
Packet sent with a source address of 4.53.104.66
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!
Success rate is 97 percent (97/100), round-trip min/avg/max =3D 8/16/24 ms
traceroute out of the L3 pop in San Diego
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 4.2.2.4
1 4.71.136.185 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
2 4.2.2.4 12 msec 12 msec 16 msec
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Smith, Thomas
<Smith.Thomas@scrippshealth.org> wrote:
> I'm dropping about 10 percent from the Sorrento Valley area.
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> Thom Smith
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Khurram Khan
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 1:46 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Weird Issues within L3
>
> Hi Group,
>
> We have a couple of circuits , internet facing with Level 3 and from our =
edge in San Diego, seeing some packet loss when trying a ping to 4.2.2.4, s=
ourcing from 63.214.184.3. anyone seeing a similar issue ?
>
> Packet sent with a source address of 63.214.184.3 !.!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!...!=
!!..!!!!!!.!!.!!!!!!.!..!!.!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> !!!!!!!!!.!!.!!!..!!!!!.!!!!.!
> Success rate is 80 percent (80/100), round-trip min/avg/max =3D 12/13/16 =
ms
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged and =
confidential information and are intended solely for the use of the individ=
ual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended reci=
pient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended r=
ecipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this=
e-mail or any of its attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have rec=
eived this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sending individua=
l or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original e-mail and attach=
ment(s) from your computer system. Thank you for your cooperation.
