[174933] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: large BCP38 compliance testing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jimmy Hess)
Sun Oct 5 21:45:16 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <43245.1412265241@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:44:49 -0500
To: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> The *real* problem isn't the testing.
> It's the assumption that you can actually *do* anything useful with this data.
> Name-n-shame probably won't get us far - and the way the US works, if there's a
At least "name and shame" is something more useful than nothing done.
Ideally you would have transit providers and peering exchanges
placing "Must implement BCP38" into their peering policy, and then
they could use the data to help enforce their peering policies.
--
-JH
