[174789] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: .sj/.bv == privacy?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Oct 1 12:48:38 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:08:19 -0700."
<542C26F3.6000107@dcrocker.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:43:56 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1412181836_2347P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:08:19 -0700, Dave Crocker said:
> In other words, anything that explicitly identifies traffic as
> attempting greater privacy is likely to be a greater target for attack.
Which is a good reason to encrypt all network traffic by default, even if
it's just videos of kittens. You can still figure out a lot by doing
endpoint analysis, but it's a start (especially if one endpoint is
an 800 pound gorilla that can serve up almost anything).
--==_Exmh_1412181836_2347P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=Qfj9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1412181836_2347P--
