[174722] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: update

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Sep 28 00:46:58 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 27 Sep 2014 21:10:28 -0400."
 <14859081.3320.1411866628033.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 00:46:39 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

--==_Exmh_1411879599_2244P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 21:10:28 -0400, Jay Ashworth said:

> I haven't an example case, but it is theoretically possible.

The sendmail setuid bug, where it failed to check the return code
because it was *never* possible for setuid from root to non-root to fail...
... until the Linux kernel grew new features.

--==_Exmh_1411879599_2244P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
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=w6rw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1411879599_2244P--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post