[17470] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dax Kelson)
Wed Jun 3 05:42:32 1998

Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 03:09:23 -0600 (MDT)
From: Dax Kelson <dkelson@inconnect.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <m0yh9S4-0007zYC@rip.psg.com>

On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Randy Bush wrote:

> > Currently about 5%-15% of my traffic gets routed over the UtahREP.
> 
> please describe measurement technique.
> 
> randy

You are up late. :)  

Well, before my UtahREP connection, 100% of my traffic went over my
transit links. 

Now about 5-15% of my total traffic (show int X) goes over my UtahREP
connection.  

Today there are only 13 participants on the UtahREP, although there are
about 40 ISPs in Utah (although probably 30 of them have less than 1,000
customers).  All 40 would have to be connected to the UtahREP to know for
sure exactly how much of my IP traffic is "local" (local being defined as
within the state of Utah).

Now when US West joins, the definition of "local" will change since their
coverage includes 14 states.

Dax Kelson
Internet Connect, Inc.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post