[174585] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Bare TLD resolutions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Fri Sep 19 11:01:46 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1409190959570.3000@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:01:36 -0700
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Apple-Mail=_E22BED42-76E4-4BF5-8670-65040B26B34B
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=windows-1252
On Sep 19, 2014, at 2:01 AM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
>> To be clear, generic TLDs (gTLDs) can=92t have bare (dotless) TLDs =
(or wildcards).
> Wildcards are being used for the name collision gubbins.
Ah, true. Apologies. There is a waiver from that restriction exclusively =
for the name collision stuff. I believe the waiver expires 90 days after =
the initial delegation.
Regards,
-drc
--Apple-Mail=_E22BED42-76E4-4BF5-8670-65040B26B34B
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUHEVQAAoJENV6ebf0/4rXciAIAIT0QrZXi49ZSj0oyXB/Gwxl
b58tWIssEzpqVNNMJoTBMIoU0bNZIU0xf8e6IORHR5GBHsm3/MWWfM0q63CKccRq
4xvxNdvzLGixFZ7NFjpSFUCiBgButnFeGGMXNv2D1NZdz5wWT9E4lSz79ugoW8VU
eUCVm6P1vQSD/aLzcMNBuAnOgIOYoW0gannDFEnTekEmA3y1vXnkKJCX5p2saSyH
pGyeAdLE0GhxuA+YrTIzfeflqyiYzE5DZzilxTW3p2jy2orlt4ROTutof98bnnPm
iv3qJtcKKljfvJ40xMlWPRxiHi3mp8H6kf4+BX7JvLo2CmQXbG+xIWXgJFRW9ks=
=lDhU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_E22BED42-76E4-4BF5-8670-65040B26B34B--
