[174576] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Fri Sep 19 00:32:44 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <18BEDE07-6502-49FE-856C-6D5CE1B6081B@arbor.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:32:36 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> wrote=
:
>
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Andy Litzinger <andy.litzinger.lists@gmail.=
com> wrote:
>
>> I appreciate any ideas!
>
> My idea mainly centers around the operational complexity and difficulty o=
f troubleshooting a setup of this nature.
>
yes, this.
> Why not just let routing take its natural course? Or at most, play some =
simple preference games which have consistent outcomes?
>
I think he's only getting default from his provider(s), which is a
shame, get full routes instead and then play the preferences off...(I
think).
> This kind of thing is generally far more trouble than it's worth, in my e=
xperience.
>
this, yes.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
> Equo ne credite, Teucri.
>
> -- Laoco=C3=B6n
>
