[174546] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: upstream support for flowspec
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Kristoff)
Thu Sep 18 14:06:42 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:06:34 -0500
From: John Kristoff <jtk@cymru.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <ygfbnqcbyrz.fsf@corbe.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:53:52 -0400
Daniel Corbe <corbe@corbe.net> wrote:
> Is there anything in the air about widening the adoption base? Cisco?
> Brocade?
I've seen some suggesting that increased support, but even at Juniper,
actions seem to speak larger than words. There seems to be very little
interest for awhile now. However, I do know of some providers who use
it, largely internal only.
We also have tried a community flow-spec service, and more recently
have been prototyping a community RTBH server with flow-spec capability
(ping me off list if you want to hear more or see me at NANOG 62).
A few people have recently told me they would like our community RTBH
service via flow-spec instead of just BGP next hop, but really only one
seemed seriously intent on configuring it day one.
John
