[174459] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Scotland ccTLD?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rubens Kuhl)
Tue Sep 16 13:58:25 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <3595FE58-34EC-4A83-B685-95BF70DC4773@virtualized.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:53:28 -0300
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Available s* include sf, sp, sq, su and sw.
>
> SF (Finland, from =E2=80=9CSuomi Finland=E2=80=9D) is =E2=80=9Ctransition=
ally reserved=E2=80=9D meaning it
> is allocated but will be removed from the allocated list =E2=80=9Csoon=E2=
=80=9D (for some
> value of the variable =E2=80=9Csoon=E2=80=9D). I believe the hold down ti=
mer for
> transitionally reserved is something like 50 years now. As such, it=E2=80=
=99s not
> available.
>
> SU is the Soviet Union, now classified as =E2=80=9Cexceptionally reserved=
=E2=80=9D which
> IANA treats as available for assignment (other exceptionally reserved cod=
es
> are EU, UK, and AC). Don=E2=80=99t get me started on why SU is exception=
ally
> reserved instead of transitionally reserved.
>
Why SU is not transitionally reserved:
http://vimeo.com/87939821
Rubens
