[174412] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 2000::/6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Sep 12 21:55:23 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <5412A694.2050105@lanparty.ee>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:51:51 -0700
To: Tarko Tikan <tarko@lanparty.ee>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
My guess, actually, would be that someone was entering a more specific =
default (2000::/3) using a numeric keypad and missed the key with an off =
by one row error.
There is no matching entry in whois for 2000::/64 (or shorter), so it is =
unlikely that 2000::/64 was an intended configuration.
Owen
On Sep 12, 2014, at 12:53 AM, Tarko Tikan <tarko@lanparty.ee> wrote:
> hey,
>=20
>> maybe i am more than usually st00pid this evening, but i am no =
smarter
>> on what actually happened, how it was detected
>=20
> Dunno about others but I personally detected it using my tools that =
look for our prefixes (or more specifics) being advertised by someone =
else. Large covering prefix obviously triggered the bells.
>=20
> I'm pretty sure it was a typo in the config, the prefix length had to =
be /64 but was entered as /6 instead.
>=20
> --=20
> tarko
