[174383] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Interesting problems with using IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (sthaug@nethelp.no)
Sun Sep 7 15:03:06 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:02:56 +0200 (CEST)
To: cb.list6@gmail.com
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGSDiwW9ovcTQC1rvpT1LVQs_T4Of9Af5tVj2wYZNCwqug@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> There are decades of mailing lists archives at nanog and others that have
> the same thing -- 1) stressed out ops guy 2) buggy code (tac says need to
> load latest code as first step) 3) L2 mess -- most of those examples of
> epic failure are ipv4 related, but many are just ethernet fails.
>
> If your point is that IPv6 cannot be deployed at scale, i have a list of
> meaningful counter examples where in fact it does work.
>
> And as already mention, the mailing list archive at nanog and others is
> full of folks with poor design or gear.
Did you actually read the whole story? Did you read Jeff Wheeler's
presentation, referenced in the comment?
http://inconcepts.biz/~jsw/ipv6_nd_problems_with_l2_mcast.pdf
Steinar Haug, AS 2116
