[17412] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Mon Jun 1 03:49:38 1998
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 00:41:08 -0700
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@priori.net>
In-Reply-To: <19980531133455.51144@mcs.net>
At 01:34 PM 5/31/98 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
>Uh, hold on a second....
>
>I didn't say to make the first ASN "unreasonably" expensive (and I do
>believe $500 is unreasonable).
No, you just said "This does make sense - a lot of sense." when Jamie
Scheinblum suggested that "unbundled" ASNs be made unreasonably high.
>However, with a REASONABLE first ASN fee (ie: $50 or thereabouts) bundling
>THAT with a /19 when you get your first PI allocation is even more
>reasonable.
While I agree that $500 *might* be too high, I honestly do not think
something on the order of $200 or $250 would be too high, especially as a
"one time" fee with the $30 recurring charge.
>After all, the justification for the IP space encompasses that for the ASN,
>so the work has already been done, and the additional effort at that point
>should be literally a few keystrokes.
Good point.
>My proposals to fix the issue with regards to getting a /19 if you're
>multihomed are also out there; has NANOG seen them?
I have not. But I haven't been following this as closely as I probably
should have.
>Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
TTFN,
patrick
**************************************************************
Patrick W. Gilmore voice: +1-650-482-2840
Director of Operations, CCIE #2983 fax: +1-650-482-2844
PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net
"Tomorrow's Performance.... Today"
**************************************************************
