[174071] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Best US Tunnelbroker for Youtube
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ryan Shea)
Wed Aug 20 14:01:50 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20140820173642.GA17433@srv03.cluenet.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:01:41 -0400
From: Ryan Shea <ryanshea@google.com>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Sorry, I wasn't clear. When my tunnel is not functioning correctly my end
hosts still have global v6 addresses and a route. The v6 tcp connections
would fail entirely, so v4 would handily win a tcp setup race. A v4-only
client does not experience huge delays in video loading. I'm not sure happy
eyeballs is implemented in Android.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:26:37PM -0400, Ryan Shea wrote:
> > video loading takes fuuuuuuuurever on Android/Chromecast/GoogleTV
> > (which hints that happy eyeballs, if it exists for Android, isn't
> > working so well for the YouTube app).
>
> Happy Eyeballs is only about TCP session setup race, not how the
> established session performs. Normally with bias (headstart) for IPv6,
> sometimes (Apple) egoistic and reckless without.
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel
>
> --
> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
>
