[174040] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rubens Kuhl)
Mon Aug 18 23:37:55 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1408182101050.540@whammy.cluebyfour.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:37:47 -0300
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Justin M. Streiner <
streiner@cluebyfour.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> No, I expect it to be part and parcel of the basic fees, as IPv4
>> is, which I'm happy to hear it is in this case.
>>
>
> Based on a response I saw in this thread earlier today, it sounds like
> IPv6 support is no longer a separate charge from Akamai. Perhaps that
> hasn't filtered out to the salescritters yet.
Or they did get the memo, but realised that no sale == no commission.
Rubens
