[174019] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Urgent
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hugo Slabbert)
Mon Aug 18 14:37:29 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:35:21 +0000
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAO0-hXbQLRMFE+RM4d9Tvde_uOpZbdJxsgFnOJFcP3Bq_Gpq=g@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Per Michael Valentine Smith 127.0.0.1 should work.
This also has the benefit of working over IPv6 (::1) without violating
the ineffibility Karl referred to.
Although, technically, since many gods are omnipresent, shouldn't you
just be able to send the packet to any address and it will be
received? I'm not clear on the implementation details as I would
assume the gods would need to be in promiscuous mode for that to work
and I'm pretty sure that would pose a problem for some gods that are
said to be omnipresent...
----- Message from Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com> ---------
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:15:39 -0700
From: Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com>
Subject: Re: Urgent
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>
>> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
>>
>>
> Per Michael Valentine Smith 127.0.0.1 should work.
>
> --
> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
----- End message from Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com> -----
--
Hugo
