[174003] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mehmet Akcin)
Mon Aug 18 13:02:13 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Aaron Hopkins <lists@die.net>
From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:56:24 -0700
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1408180947450.22818@namshub.die.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I meant to ask. Did you ask akamai why they would be charging for ipv6? Is =
there any logical reason other than just wanting to make little more money,=
that makes them have to charge for ipv6? =20
-----Original Message-----
From: "Aaron Hopkins" <lists@die.net>
Sent: =E2=80=8E8/=E2=80=8E18/=E2=80=8E2014 9:53 AM
To: "Mehmet Akcin" <mehmet@akcin.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: RE: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> What did they say when you asked them(Akamai)?
I quoted their response in my mail; sorry if that wasn't clear. They
offered to enable IPv6 service for a non-trivial monthly recurring fee,
which they offered to send me a revised contract to include.
> I would imagine ipv6 to be included in price not an additional fee.
I was surprised to find that wasn't the case.
-- Aaron
