[173944] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Aug 14 07:57:25 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <53EC3F4E.2000004@sonn.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 04:52:13 -0700
To: Steve Noble <snoble@sonn.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, manning bill <bmanning@isi.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I believe at one point, SPRINT had in the RADB (and actively advertised) =
0.0.0.0/2, 64.0.0.0/2, 128.0.0.0/2, and 192.0.0.0/2 under something =
called =93Quarter Default Route, see Rational Default Project=94 or =
words to that effect.
I could be wrong. It was a long time ago and I barely remember SPRINT =
any more.
Owen
On Aug 13, 2014, at 9:47 PM, Steve Noble <snoble@sonn.com> wrote:
> Sprint also had 192/2 in the RADB :)
>=20
> manning bill wrote:
>>=20
>> Sprint used to proxy aggregate=85 I remember 128.0.0.0/3
>>=20
>> the real question, imho, is if folks are going to look into their =
crystal balls and roadmap where the default offered is a /32 (either v4 =
or v6)
>> and plan accordingly, or just slap another bandaid on the oozing =
wound...
>>=20
>> /bill
>> PO Box 12317
>> Marina del Rey, CA 90295
>> 310.322.8102
>>=20
