[173906] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Wed Aug 13 01:09:51 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:08:04 +0300
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGVbynPFyvkttCoXGHcgmG6ethybDBAiKTUZVOSj=HqziQ@mail.g
mail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
At 18:10 12/08/2014 -0400, William Herrin wrote:
We went with 768 - enough time to replace the routers with ASR9010s. It is
merely a stop-gap measure to give everyone time to replace their routers in
an orderly fashion.
-Hank
>On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote:
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.html
>
>I note that the recommended command in that article, "mls cef
>maximum-routes ip 1000", will throw most of your IPv6 routes out of
>the TCAM instead. Which if you have any IPv6 traffic of substance just
>kills you in the other direction. Might want to try something more
>like "mls cef maximum-routes ip 900".
>
>Regards,
>Bill Herrin
>
>--
>William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
>Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
>Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?
