[173873] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Mikrotik RouterBoard and Ubiquiti Networks Routing and Switching
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rubens Kuhl)
Tue Aug 12 12:53:48 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <53EA447B.8090007@ledeuns.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:53:41 -0300
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
To: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Denis Fondras <xxnog@ledeuns.net> wrote:
> Le 12/08/2014 17:15, Justin Wilson a =C3=A9crit :
> > Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration=
.
> > Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still
> > working things out. A lot of what you have to to do with the UBNT line
> > has to still be done in command line. If you are cool with that then n=
ot
> > a big deal. The RouterOS is a pretty mature product and has a good
> > backing of forums, wiki, and other things. Not saying uBNT doesn=C5=A1=
t, just
> > not as mature.
> >
>
> May we discuss IPv6 support ? Last time I checked, UBNT was lagging
> behind...
>
UBNT wireless operating system, AirOS, is lagging behind. UBNT router
operating system, EdgeOS, has extensive IPv6 support in the command line
interface. GUI has some IPv6 support (
http://wiki.ubnt.com/IPv6_-_GUI_Options).
Rubens
