[173808] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Remooted: a deployment design for Muni Fiber (was Re: Muni Fiber
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Aug 7 10:41:15 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <53E16249.8080906@matthew.at>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 07:35:28 -0700
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Aug 5, 2014, at 4:01 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at> wrote:
> Is there any way we could stop this discussion until we can get some =
participants who have experience doing things like emergency =
post-ice-storm overhead circuit restoration to show up and explain =
exactly why charging a small one-time fee for a fiber from A to Z is =
probably not a sustainable model?
I completely agree that XC without MRC is an unsustainable model, but I =
believe only one person proposed that, so I don=92t think calling for an =
end to the discussion just because you realize what everyone but one =
person does is warranted.
> In the meantime, I'd like to see the city where an ISP can buy as many =
of the microducts as they want. I'd like to buy them all, please... =
though I have no intention of running anything though them, as I'm an =
investor in the local cable TV company.
Which seems to support my argument for direct fiber PREM<->Serving Wire =
Center.
Owen
