[173752] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Sat Aug 2 23:11:28 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Nilsson?= <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 05:11:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20140802233117.GA28317@besserwisser.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--nextPart1823160.iOSL8hkGje
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sunday, August 03, 2014 01:31:17 AM M=E5ns Nilsson wrote:
> Oh, yes, there is. Multicast? IPv6? Both CAN be done, but
> probably won't.
I'm talking about the opportunities large bandwidth=20
presents, non-technical issues aside.
Certainly, IPv6 and Multicast have a place on a 1Gbps link=20
into the customer's home.
Unless I misunderstand what you're trying to say...
Mark.
--nextPart1823160.iOSL8hkGje
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=W/Za
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1823160.iOSL8hkGje--
