[173729] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Helms)
Fri Aug 1 16:34:54 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <F2E2F1D9-1386-4688-8325-189C0699BD93@ufp.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:32:37 -0400
From: Scott Helms <khelms@zcorum.com>
To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
>
>
>
> I can never see a case where letting them play at Layer 3 or above helps.
> That=E2=80=99s bad news, stay away. But I think some well crafted L2 ser=
vices
> could actually _expand_ consumer choice. I mean running a dark fiber
> GigE to supply voice only makes no sense, but a 10M channel on a GPON
> serving a VoIP box may=E2=80=A6
>
Even in those cases where there isn't a layer 3 operator nor a chance for a
viable resale of layer 1/2 services.
