[173726] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn L)
Fri Aug 1 16:18:27 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <D00131EE.6840A%Lee@asgard.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:18:18 -0400
From: Shawn L <shawnl@up.net>
To: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Slightly off-topic but what are people using as a cpe device in a
dual-stack scenario like this?
On Friday, August 1, 2014, Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/14 3:45 PM, "joshua rayburn" <jbrayburn@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Starting in 3.10 code you can utilize Bulk Port Allocation to carve out
> >small consecutive port bundles for end users as to not mess up SIP
> >functionsand High Speed Logging to log individual customers ports for law
> >enforcement needs without overrunning your logging server.
>
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6056 documents a security concern with bulk
> port assignments.
>
> Lee
>
>
>
