[173715] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Aug 1 03:44:36 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:44:28 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAKJkDEu1cz=58sRFoPzS3TFkQ3Fdw0Xd3iHTTumsOPUvD4SsEw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--nextPart1522743.auqaACrcxo
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Friday, August 01, 2014 09:30:57 AM mcfbbqroast . wrote:
> I think this is a sector the
> government would do well in. Unlike being an actual ISP
> there's no ambiguity (oversubscription, customer
> service, etc). Just provide a gigabit line with no
> congestion and solid uptime, or a fibre pair with solid
> uptime. End of story.
Couldn't agree more :-).
Mark.
--nextPart1522743.auqaACrcxo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=vElg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1522743.auqaACrcxo--
