[173664] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fred Baker (fred))
Wed Jul 30 12:47:10 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:44:41 +0000
In-Reply-To: <9945656C-6386-4DEA-B9AD-D6E53DDDFA40@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Apple-Mail=_91476771-EBD2-4676-82E0-B4460BE26EE3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=euc-kr
On Jul 30, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> I will say that if amazon would get off the dime and support IPv6, it =
would make a significant difference.=20
Per Microsoft public statements, they are now moving address space =
allocated them in Brazil to the US to fill a major service shortfall in =
Azure. They=A1=AFre not the only kids on the block with that problem, =
but are perhaps the one most publicly reported. To my way of thinking, =
having services like that adopt IPv6 and tell their customers that they =
need to access the service using IPv6 would go a lot farther that =
residential service in pushing enterprise adoption.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-anderson-siit-dc gives a fairly clever =
way to make it possible for the service itself to be IPv6-only and yet =
provide IPv4 access, and preserve IPv4 addresses in the process.
--Apple-Mail=_91476771-EBD2-4676-82E0-B4460BE26EE3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iD8DBQFT2SD5bjEdbHIsm0MRAqO9AKCUOFPan9IZGQg81WhYOAQAxVLTtwCgoomW
8iGvBsyf21A0MD3zLrSQ7g0=
=pWlE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_91476771-EBD2-4676-82E0-B4460BE26EE3--
