[173656] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FW: Public Notice: FCC asks for comments on network security
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alain Hebert)
Wed Jul 30 11:16:14 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:16:07 -0400
From: Alain Hebert <ahebert@pubnix.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <53D8F9BE.3040100@aimvalley.nl>
Reply-To: ahebert@pubnix.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Should.
It is a few million$ in man hours thou.
( Not necessary spent, but budgeted )
And still no BCP38 recommendation.
I wonder:
1. If they taught of it;
2. What was their process to not include it;
Oh well.
-----
Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
On 07/30/14 09:57, Pieter Hulshoff wrote:
> On 27-07-14 16:15, Livingood, Jason wrote:
>> FYI. The U.S. Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau released a
>> Public Notice on Friday (copied below), seeking comment on the
>> “implementation and effectiveness of the CSRIC III recommendations”.
>>
>> Comments are due by September 26. Some folks here may wish to send
>> the FCC comments on this, especially areas pertaining to preventing
>> IP address spoofing.
>
>
> Interesting RFCs. Out of curiosity: do (many) routers already support
> the necessary ingress filter features to support these RFCs?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Pieter Hulshoff
>
>
>
