[173650] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Walter)
Wed Jul 30 08:55:54 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAJcK4gputiCQaKfKj2P890+9XM_hpx7SYfVtx=3n2UMiSZF4SA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:01:59 -0700
From: Jeff Walter <jwalter@weebly.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We also have a Solid Optics CWDM meter and it does the job quite nicely. It
feels solid (haha...) and is relatively cheap.
--
Jeff Walter
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Neil Davidson <neil@knd.org> wrote:
> We have the Solid Optics DWDM and CWDM power meters. Simple, inexpensive
> and works well ...
> http://www.solid-optics.com/category/cwdm-dwdm/power-meter ... n
>
>
>
> --
>
> K. Neil Davidson
> +1-720-258-6345
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Tom Hill <tom@ninjabadger.net> wrote:
>
> > On 28/07/14 19:33, Timothy Kaufman wrote:
> >
> >> Also maybe the ODPM-48.
> >>
> >
> > I've got the CWDM version of this, and it does the job. Haven't explored
> > the test result downloading/archiving features (didn't expect them to
> work
> > with Linux anyway) but overall it was very helpful for measuring loss
> > across various passive muxes (where DDM wasn't available).
> >
> > Tom
> >
>
