[173608] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Tue Jul 29 13:59:59 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Really-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D87E405-A6E2-4C45-B221-828701D915B5@delong.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:59:16 -0400
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> As an ISP customer, would you really accept not
>being supplied a globally unique address? Really?
Hi Owen,
I wouldn't, but outside of the folks I know in this forum, few would
notice or care. So long as the ISP has an alternative available for
those who do care (such as an existing static IP request mechanism)
CGNs are low-risk from a customer-acceptance position.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?
