[173589] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Corbe)
Tue Jul 29 11:01:27 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Daniel Corbe <corbe@corbe.net>
To: Colton Conor <colton.conor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:00:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAMDdSzNABh=OtkQn52xJLaY=h26Ho3Bkk54aVSJTXeDXsO30MQ@mail.gmail.com>
(Colton Conor's message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:45:16 -0500")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Colton Conor <colton.conor@gmail.com> writes:
> We are looking for recommendations for a carrier grade nat solution. Who is
> the leaders in this space? How do carrier grade NAT platforms integrate
> with DHCP and DNS solutions? How do you keep track of copyright violations
> in a CGNAT solution if multiple customers are sharing the same public IP
> address?
Right now I'm using A10 for NAT. I can't say enough good things about
these dudes.
But as far as DMCA takedowns are concerned, we're in the habit of
casually ignoring them unless they come through our custodian of
records.
That would be an excellent question for your SE. And I'm kind of
curious myself now.
-Daniel
