[173582] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Richardson)
Mon Jul 28 17:35:46 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGUQDSJRbJ-1PGqiCf1_CRHC+BBOqoKBDZN8-LAR1q+zgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:35:39 -0700
From: Jim Richardson <weaselkeeper@gmail.com>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I pay for (x) bits/sec up/down. From/to any eyecandysource. If said
eyecandy origination can't handle the traffic, then I see a slowdown,
that's life. But if <$IP_PROVIDER> throttles it specifically, rather
than throttling me to (x),I consider that fraud.
I didn't pay for (x) bits/sec from some whitelist of sources only.
