[17357] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Great Exchange
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Fri May 29 13:29:57 1998
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Date: 29 May 1998 17:42:34 +0200
In article <199805291432.KAA29721@jekyll.piermont.com>,
Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
>There is no good long term reason for metered internet usage at the
>end user level, and there is also considerable market pressure against
>it.
OK, NANOG means North American ... etc, but do you have _any_ idea
what connectivity _to_ the US costs?
"The" internet backbone has traditionally been the USA. So foreigners
payed for a line to connect to the US and the US got connectivity to
Europe, Japan etc basically for free. But that is changing.
So for high speed access to destinations outside a country one would
need to meter that. With 28k8 access, there's no real need, but once
an end user gets the possibility to use his 2Mbit/sec ADSL line to
download at full speed from, say, Europe, you're looking at a different
picture.
Mike.
--
Miquel van Smoorenburg | Our vision is to speed up time,
miquels@cistron.nl | eventually eliminating it.
