[173508] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Sat Jul 26 12:29:45 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <345B77FA-C6E7-4839-ABFD-E66E536626F7@isipp.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:59:37 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell@isipp.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I hardly ever see you say something wrong about net neutrality or anything
else :). No, other, far more usual suspects in mind here.
On Saturday, July 26, 2014, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell@isipp.com>
wrote:
>
> Suresh wrote:
>
> > The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately
> (and
> > add professors of law to this already toxic mix)
>
> Ahem. I resemble that remark.
>
> Anne
>
> Anne P. Mitchell,
> Attorney at Law
> CEO/President
> Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
> Member, Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
> Author: Section 6 of the Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003
> Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose
>
--
--srs (iPad)
