[173499] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Fri Jul 25 21:10:24 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5178.1406336528@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:40:16 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
5 too. Agglutinating multiple separate problems into a single complex title
2 regulation solution
Enough hot air driven thrust is being generated to ensure porcine aviation
too, as section 3 assures us.
On 26-Jul-2014 6:32 am, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:10:09 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
> > The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately
> (and
> > add professors of law to this already toxic mix)
>
> So what you're saying is that the debate is in total violation of
> RFC1925, section 4? :)
>
