[173497] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Fri Jul 25 20:42:06 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <53D2EBD7.2000404@nic-naa.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:10:09 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately (and
add professors of law to this already toxic mix)

On Saturday, July 26, 2014, Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
wrote:

> On 7/25/14 4:29 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
>> Not that some leading proponents of net neutrality would even know a
>> router
>> if it bit them ...
>>
>
> i'm _trying_ to imagine the lobbyists, corporate counsels, and company
> officers above the v.p. of engineering i know who have vastly superior clue
> and i'm finding my imagination lacking.
>
> $friday.
>


-- 
--srs (iPad)

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post