[173465] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Correspondence to the FCC re: preemption of local government as a

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Thu Jul 24 21:18:33 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Really-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <53D1A4A2.8040902@gmail.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:17:59 -0400
To: Roy <r.engehausen@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Roy <r.engehausen@gmail.com> wrote:
> The question posed is whether or not a state can control where a local
> governmental agencies can provide service.

Hi Roy,

If the answer is anything other than, "of course they can," then I
really want to read the judge's opinion. There are no shortage of
examples of one locality providing services to another (it happens all
the time with water systems) but I've not heard of such happening
contrary to the wishes of the respective state government.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com  bill@herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post