[173376] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The case(s) for, and against, preemption (was Re: Muni Fiber
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Brunner-Williams)
Tue Jul 22 17:19:08 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:06:15 -0700
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
To: Ray Soucy <rps@maine.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CALFTrnO9EnYtJ4RBYQo2Quern4KuuCae2_xV7o9V=GihyyTGsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 7/22/14 1:55 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> You're over-thinking it. Use the power company as a model and you'll
> close to the right path.
Well, no, but thanks for your thoughts.
Portland vs. Cumberland County as respective hypothetical bonding and
regulating authorities, not {Bangor Hydro|Florida Power & Light|...} and
Central Maine Power, generators and distributor, respectively.
Eric
