[173330] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Corbe)
Tue Jul 22 10:22:55 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Daniel Corbe <corbe@corbe.net>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:20:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGSFJnnWJZ_vKzP37fN4fCiWb=10sx-goS1=aQFsexeUWw@mail.gmail.com>
(Ca By's message of "Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:12:54 -0700")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> writes:
> On Jul 22, 2014 7:04 AM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>>
>> Verizon wireless has other transits apart from 701.
>>
>
> That's interesting that they have a different capacity management strategy
> for the competitive wireless market than they have for their captive
> landline customers.
>
> Seems market forces are making wireless a functional network without the
> peering brinksmanship while market failings are allowing landline to take
> advantage of a captive install base
>
Or it could be that they're just functionally two different business
units. From what my contacts at Verizon Wireless tell me, Verizon
Business move at a glacial pace, so they buy circuits from whomever they
can.
