[173328] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Tue Jul 22 10:13:05 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <70375366-1C3D-40A9-A0CD-768A0BE776CC@puck.nether.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:12:54 -0700
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Jul 22, 2014 7:04 AM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
> Verizon wireless has other transits apart from 701.
>
That's interesting that they have a different capacity management strategy
for the competitive wireless market than they have for their captive
landline customers.
Seems market forces are making wireless a functional network without the
peering brinksmanship while market failings are allowing landline to take
advantage of a captive install base
> Sent via telepathy
>
> > On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Question: does verizon wireless have a different capacity / peering
> > practice from verizon broadband ? Or do verizon wireless customers also
> > suffer the same performance issue?
