[173318] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mehmet Akcin)
Tue Jul 22 07:04:10 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>
In-Reply-To: <CFF47082.EA7EA%wolfgang.nagele@ausregistry.com.au>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:03:57 -0400
To: "Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry)" <wolfgang.nagele@ausregistry.com.au>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
And what did HE say when you asked them?
Mehmet
> On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:48, "Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry)" <wolfgang.nagele=
@ausregistry.com.au> wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> We=E2=80=99ve been customers of Hurricane Electric for a number of years n=
ow and always been happy with their service.
>=20
> In recent months packet loss on some of their major routes has become a ve=
ry common (every few days) occurrence. Without knowledge of their network I a=
m unsure what=E2=80=99s the cause of it but we=E2=80=99ve seen it on the Tok=
yo - US routes as well as the London - US routes. It reminds me of the Cogen=
t expansion which was carried out by unsustainable oversubscription which ev=
entually resulted in unusable service for a number of years. Having seen som=
e of the rates that HE has been selling for I can=E2=80=99t help but wonder i=
f they made the same mistake ...
>=20
> Here is an example of what=E2=80=99s going on again atm.
> HOST: prolocation01.ring.nlnog.ne Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StD=
ev
> 1.|-- 2a00:d00:ff:136::253 0.0% 11 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.=
0
> 2.|-- 2a00:d00:1:12::1 0.0% 10 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.=
1
> 3.|-- hurricane-electric.nikhef 0.0% 10 0.7 3.1 0.7 8.3 2.=
9
> 4.|-- 100ge9-1.core1.lon2.he.ne 0.0% 10 9.8 12.6 8.0 19.2 4.=
1
> 5.|-- 100ge1-1.core1.nyc4.he.ne 10.0% 10 74.7 74.6 73.7 80.8 2.=
3
> 6.|-- 10ge10-3.core1.lax1.he.ne 30.0% 10 133.4 138.0 133.4 145.1 4.=
8
> 7.|-- 10ge1-3.core1.lax2.he.net 20.0% 10 135.7 139.1 133.4 145.1 4.=
5
> 8.|-- 2001:504:13::3b 40.0% 10 143.2 143.1 142.1 144.4 0.=
8
> 9.|-- 2402:7800:100:1::55 50.0% 10 144.4 144.1 143.8 144.4 0.=
2
> 10.|-- 2402:7800:0:1::f6 60.0% 10 298.7 298.4 298.2 298.7 0.=
2
> 11.|-- ge-0-1-4.cor02.syd03.nsw. 10.0% 10 299.3 298.9 298.3 299.5 0.=
5
> 12.|-- 2402:7800:0:2::18a 20.0% 10 299.7 299.4 298.9 300.1 0.=
4
> 13.|-- 2001:dcd:12::10 30.0% 10 299.8 299.5 298.8 300.0 0.=
5
>=20
> Is anybody else observing this as well?
>=20
> Cheers,
> Wolfgang
