[173275] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Muni Fiber and Politics

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Mon Jul 21 17:37:30 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:36:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <C133B354-069E-45A8-B969-FA405B0A24F4@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com>

> Whoever installs fiber first and gets any significant fraction of
> subscribers in any
> but the densest of population centers is a competition killer, _IF_
> you let them
> parlay that physical infrastructure into an anti-competitive
> environment for higher layer services.

As I noted in a long thread last year, I think that providing noncompetitive
L2 aggregation as well -- on the same type of terms -- is productive in
reducing barriers to entry.

But no sense in relitigating that here.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra@baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post